Belhaven University vs Blue Mountain Christian University
Side-by-side college ROI comparison from College Scorecard data
Verdict
Belhaven University has a 100.0% graduation rate compared to Blue Mountain Christian University at 100.0%. Average median debt: Belhaven University at $31,034 vs Blue Mountain Christian University at $26,576. Average first-year post-graduation earnings: $52,250 vs $51,000.
| Metric | Belhaven University | Blue Mountain Christian University |
|---|---|---|
| Graduation Rate | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| School Type | Private | Private |
| State | Ms | Ms |
| Avg Median Debt Average median debt across all tracked majors | $31,034 | $26,576* |
| Avg 1yr Earnings Average first-year earnings across all tracked majors | $52,250* | $51,000 |
| Majors Tracked | 20 | 15 |
| Best ROI Major | Computer Science (93/100) | Mathematics (95/100)* |
| Best Major Debt | $25,925 | $22,515* |
| Best Major 1yr Earnings | $95,000* | $78,000 |
Belhaven University has a 100.0% graduation rate compared to Blue Mountain Christian University at 100.0%. Average median debt: Belhaven University at $31,034 vs Blue Mountain Christian University at $26,576. Average first-year post-graduation earnings: $52,250 vs $51,000.
Explore More
Belhaven University and Blue Mountain Christian University graduate students at similar rates — 100.0% and 100.0% respectively. With completion rates comparable, the comparison reduces to cost, earnings, and program mix; the institutional-effect-on-completion question essentially nets out.
The schools sit within a moderate debt range of each other: $26,576 versus $31,034. Read those alongside the earnings figures — debt by itself is misleading, what matters is the debt-to-first-year-earnings ratio, which captures the real burden of repayment relative to the income the degree produces.
Earnings outcomes track closely — Belhaven University and Blue Mountain Christian University graduates report similar first-year wages. The school decision in cases like this is usually decided on non-financial axes (program quality, geography, fit) since the ROI math runs close enough to be inside the noise.
Both schools sit in Ms, which simplifies the in-state-vs-out-of-state tuition question and aligns the regional labor markets students will enter post-graduation. Cross-school comparisons within the same state should weight program mix and employer-pipeline depth heavily — the cost-of-living and labor-market backdrop is effectively held constant, so program-level differences are the differentiator.
Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard, 2026.